Which came first, the idea of displaying genealogy as linking familial relations from top to bottom chronologically, or the term 'family tree'?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a35c7/a35c758de75bafc13984f6511ca79cb769fce7f3" alt=""
Here's a pretty typical family tree, comprising what looks to be around 9 generations. The farthest back in history is at the top-most part of the 'tree,' and the most recent at the bottom. Weirdly, this is completely inverse from how trees actually grow (you know, from the ground up), but the analogy has stuck so well that it's very easy to find 'family trees' that are stylized to resemble physical trees.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbfcf/cbfcf43d6e4e5870ce3fb6948edc26850510b170" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43439/43439d3e74cbcba2e4cd84243233cd170b799f63" alt=""
Family trees are a way of tracking relations between members of one or many families, but once you go enough generations back, or enough cousins sideways, it becomes increasingly difficult to accurately, visually portray the information. For instance, it's likely (though I'm sure you don't want to hear it), that your biological parents (or you and your partner), have a common ancestor within written history. Super-likely if you and your partner have the same ethnic and cultural background. For the family tree, this means that a 'branch' would split (via children, grandchildren, etc.) and eventually rejoin. Visually, this would mean 'branches' crossing over each other.
Is it possible to create an organized family tree that includes dozens of generations and thousands of people, given the super-prevalence of incest?
Is a tree the best visual metaphor we can come up with?
How would a family tree of families be depicted visually? That is, instead of representing individuals, representing families (and how do you begin to define that?)
Posted by Scott.
0 comments:
Post a Comment